Problems with Molina’s Account of the Scientia Media
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The Medieval problem of the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and contingent truths about the future can be expressed by posing two closely intertwined questions: (1) how can God infallibly know causally indeterminate future events? (2) how is divine foreknowledge, which is fixed and infallible, to be reconciled with the contingency of future events? Molina’s doctrine of scientia media (middle knowledge) is an attempt to provide a substantive and plausible answer to these questions. I briefly sketch Molina’s theory of the scientia media and then go on to assess the extent to which his approach satisfactorily answers the two questions about divine foreknowledge.
References
-
Craig, W. L. (1988). The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez, Leiden, E.J. Brill.
Google Scholar
1
-
Fischer, J. M. (1994). The Metaphysics of Free Will. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Press.
Google Scholar
2
-
Flint, T. P. (1998). Divine Providence: The Molinist Account, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
3
-
Jager, C. (2013). Molinism and theological compatibilism. European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion.
Google Scholar
4
-
Kimble, K. (2014). Molina’s solution to the problem of divine foreknowledge. Philosophy Pathways, 187(1).
Google Scholar
5
-
de Molina, L. (1595). A Reconciliation of Free Choice with the Gifts of Grace, Divine Foreknowledge, Providence, Predestination, and Reprobation. Part IV, On Divine Foreknowledge (Trans. by Alfred J. Freddoso, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).
Google Scholar
6
-
Mason, H. E. (1996). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
7
-
Normore, C. (1982). Future contingents. In N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg, & E. Stump (Eds.), Logic in the High Middle Ages: Propositions and Modalities (pp. 358–381). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
8
-
Warfield, T., & DeRose, K. (1999). Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
9